It is currently Tue, 17 May 2022 03:09:45 GMT



 
Author Message
 'more'-like util for MS-DOS?
Sorry if this isn't the best place to put this... my site doesn't carry
any of the groups that sounded more applicable...

Self-explanatory title... is there a good util for DOS that performs
similarly to the UNIX 'more' command?  I'm getting so tired of 'type
foo.bar | more'.  I tried to archie 'more,' but I didn't get anything
that looked like it might work under DOS...

Thanks for your help... feel free to reply by email.

--
Jay B. Parker -- Mississippi State University -- j...@Ra.MsState.Edu
 NSF Engineering Research Center for Computational Field Simulation
"But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep."-Frost



 Fri, 09 Aug 1996 05:38:29 GMT   
 'more'-like util for MS-DOS?
j...@Ra.MsState.Edu (Jay B. Parker) writes:

 >Sorry if this isn't the best place to put this... my site doesn't carry
 >any of the groups that sounded more applicable...

 >Self-explanatory title... is there a good util for DOS that performs
 >similarly to the UNIX 'more' command?  I'm getting so tired of 'type
 >foo.bar | more'.  I tried to archie 'more,' but I didn't get anything
 >that looked like it might work under DOS...

 >Thanks for your help... feel free to reply by email.

 >--
 >Jay B. Parker -- Mississippi State University -- j...@Ra.MsState.Edu
 > NSF Engineering Research Center for Computational Field Simulation
 >"But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep."-Frost

If you are nearly happy with dos more, then you can redirect a file to it:

more < foo.bar      (much less typing).

If you want something that is a lot more flexible than UNIX more, get list,
which is one of the most indispensable DOS utils.  It even does hex output,
8th bit filtering, backspace filtering, all sorts of neat stuff.  It used to
be a shareware product.  I am using one that is several years old.  Borland
products come with a program named readme.com that seems to be an old
version of list.com, but that pages a file named readme if no filename is
given on the command line.

There is even a DOS port of less.

--
  R.Stewart(Stew) Ellis, Assoc.Prof., (Off)313-762-9765   ___________________
  Humanities & Social Science,  GMI Eng.& Mgmt. Inst.    /   _____  ______
  Flint, MI 48504      el...@nova.gmi.edu               /        / /  /  / /
  Gopher,News and  modem   maintainer, all around hack /________/ /  /  / /



 Fri, 09 Aug 1996 06:48:33 GMT   
 'more'-like util for MS-DOS?
I don't remember where but I picked up a copy of less for DOS.  Since I'm
used to typing 'more' but not used to typing '<', it comes in real handy.
I access it via a doskey macro (doskey more=less $*).

This could probably be found on the normal DOS ftp sites in a filutl
directory.
--
tom_p                           | I could get a new lease on life
internet:   p...@cnj.digex.net  | if only I didn't need the first
compuserve: 73303,1136          | and last month in advance.



 Sat, 10 Aug 1996 00:26:31 GMT   
 'more'-like util for MS-DOS?
Thanks to all who responded... less for DOS is just what I needed...
-Jay

--
Jay B. Parker -- Mississippi State University -- j...@Ra.MsState.Edu
 NSF Engineering Research Center for Computational Field Simulation
"But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep."-Frost



 Sat, 10 Aug 1996 04:08:40 GMT   
 
   [ 4 post ] 

Similar Threads

1. Help-PC likes linux so much won't run DOS

2. mars_nwe only likes ms-dos, no win95

3. Linux 'fdisk' and MS-DOS

4. Can't make MS-DOS Kermit work over ethernet, but NCSA Telnet works

5. MS-DOS floppy's...

6. Can't write to MS-DOS partition


 
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software