In article <GoIIFv....@wlbr.to.gd-es.com>,
"Allen M. Cohen" <a...@to.gd-es.com> writes:
Don't know, but I recall "at now" being dicey for a _long_ time. Why not
just use "batch" instead? If you _must_ use "at" for some reason,
"at now + 1 minute" works well enough.
Also, see queuedefs(4) and consider changing the line for the "a" queue,
i.e. to something like
a.8j1n
which would allow more concurrent "at" jobs.
--
mailto:rlha...@mindwarp.smart.net http://www.smart.net/~rlhamil