
Fujitsu jumpstart spradic success
Scenario : contractor on client site - short term holiday cover ie
little insight into history of j/s server etc.
Requirement : to build several fujitsu 250 systems with solaris 8 from
a jumpstart server using a flash image. Client has a script on j/s
server which prompts for solaris version (8), ethernet adress of new
system (gleaned from "banner" in OBP), IP address of new server, new
systemm name, and whether sun or fujitsu build required. J/S server
(in E450 FWIW) cabled to small hub, new systems also cabled to it.
The Fujitsu servers appear top have three NICs "on board" - a single
one, and below that a pair (one above the other). The top NIC of each
pair is used to connect to the hub (general advice from another sys
admin here).
In short everything seems set up OK... the boxes are cabled exactly
the same. the script on the j/s server places the ethernet address
and hostname in /etc/ethers OK, and the IP address and hostname in the
/etc/hosts file, and an entry in /etc/bootparams.
Problem : some boxes boot from net and install OK, others don;t even
boot from the net!
ie I run "boot net - install" from the OBP/ok prompt - some systems
bootstrap and immediately do that "number count" thing and progress
through building... whilst others bootstrap and display one "waiting
for ARP/RARP" message - then do nothing else whatsoever.... no more
ARP/RARP messages (which one would expect if the ethers info say was
wrong), no build starting.... and no response from the keyboard ie
hit return doesn't line feed... Its as if the very initial bootp
process has begun... but drops out/freezes/halts/fails/whatever.
This is a closed network in effect, there are no IP clashes.
The systems that fail to respond (other than a single ARP/RARP
message) have been tried also with a successfull system's cable (in
case its the cable or the hub) to no avail, and on both of the paired
NICs (other sys admins say the lone NIC is not working/used/whatever).
Any ideas? Obviously the jumspstart server is working, the ethernet
address etc is all added correctly, and even the same cables are being
used.
cheers
ian